Detect Language (DL): This is the passage from which the idea (derived from the 9th RF and is placed opposite the original:) (the translation of the terms has been fantastic and from it came the idea putting into effect the "detect language" associating to specific publications of Run Forever :) (ie 'is the actual language in which they are arranged publications and is enough to insert the original :) terms. in the case of today's post is the placement more 'easy' cause the only ones translated terms are almost identical to the originals (3 of 4 :) and then will be very curious the next RF (the time frame is years :)
The original post (Italian DL) is June 2, 2015
The Run Forever detect language in Italian is here
The Run Forever detect language in Italian is here
This is "the 4th comparison" and although they will not have 'a sense of the other (the precise location of the term linked to the method is the beginning of the 3rd general) is always important because' it is a kind of the contents of evidenziazzione all recent publications in turn joined to those dedicated to "the media and the advertising system" .I have chosen to do before the 4th 'cause it is obviously linked (for executives below) the last published Base Level 2 17M, arranged here
whereas the 3rd the lighthouse 'subsequently to a simple matter of space, and especially because' is very difficult to put it all together ... the arc temporal choices below are more 'or less equal to the other and the sense is that described in the previous publication and summarize in this passage ...
the relevant time period of 1 month is not random because 'the method of these spaces, "in the period sott'esame" had "conditions and extreme circumstances" and it works the same:) ...
I will add below to executives' the rest starting with the description of the same
Start by saying that the pictures are apparently more 'simple of others while in reality' are much more 'difficult' cause are multiple selections within each company (they are basically 6 general ones in turn with different options within each) ... so the choice was the 'easy as possible and I entered the top 10 as a function of the script shown above and the contents of the previous publication and particularly begins its title because' in this If the reports are in reality 'the base of the 2nd level and sara' what'll use 'for the 4th comparison (the thing is not personal, even in this case, and the use is in function as an example) ... the technical parts of the settings are equal to the contents of the previous publication, however, 'in this case (ie,' on a particular platform) are varied the linked ID, and each has a specific numeric extension linked to a space and for q T his is why I chose the arrangement above (real IDs are 8 and each has a single function linked to the successive codes in addition to the options described above) ... this "particular" is not indifferent with the time period taken into consideration because 'IDs are not "made by chance" but they are specific indications of the space in which the codes ... this particular will be settled is the most' important associate of the script shown above 'cause not only "been a time Difficulty 'significant' but at the same time the spaces related to ID them have had to be replaced with "solutions" not of the same level compared to the previous (those inserted today there are 2 with as many variations of temporal arches ... the first is around the April while the Grim ends today ... May 20 businesses included are 10 and are the first on a page with a maximum of 100 appearances and then there are others) ... the ID number is the difference greater with the p withdrawing publication (for the simple reason that any business is not within a single group) but 'the rest is all the same and I have associated with two words in your 2nd general and that' 'All Goods "according to the the base of the 2nd level (ie 'also in this case the individual data points of access are in reality', however, 'in contrast to the 1st level they can be formed from any number of people and choose products even apart from those published for all whenever they want to do regardless of any time span (ie 'can also be accessed 24 times in one hour by many people with only one access point and for the 2nd level system are all valid ... the first would count only to 1 and that's the difference with things written for "optimizing operations" and that means' try to increase the percentage of people who are actually in companies ... this will be 'the thought that will take' at the 4th comparison pero 'first deb bo add a link with today's written and is the full union with the previous publication ...
the union with the one above is very simple, however, 'the reference is only the 2nd level as a function of an intrinsic value tied to 1 product. Now I can go back to the 4th comparison starting right from the writings of April and May and the 'point of union with what today is precisely that mentioned above "SEO professionals" (I have also used them to bypass the imbeciles boastful :) ... this all started with the criticism of Google, seen as the engine, from people with specific skills but also 'reasoning could also be the opposite, and that is' if you imagine that it is so' easy to manage a motor, simply I would create one yourself (this is valid for all course and sense, indirectly it is written under and is tied to simple economics!) ...
The complete sense in this post is inserted and is in practice ahead of this same publication...this is rather 12M Base and is also the advance of this post
the union of the written above with the previous post related to the links just settled and '' the operability 'same "described in the publications (ie' one can 'be as good as he wants but' with a few publications can not choose the settings ... of course there is "one alternate" of the system and generally are all major SN and it is precisely for this reason that you can not change their codes (the maximum is usually a simple connecting link) ... even before the major SN exists naturally also Google ADS, which is the most 'greatest of all and after the criticism of the parent company by the professionals (the description is in the post above) actually' their multibanner, with its optimizations, just go to Google now ... having said that the union is with all things included in the 3rd general arranged here to start from its historical path and joined all the publications dedicated to the means of communic ion and advertising system ... from the post early this extract a brief thought...
union with the 4th comparison derives from this and its developments and not "scommodero 'mother house" but a province and youtube and the comparison will be' with 'a means of traditional communication "(the" relationship will 'Two-way' but as an absolute 'must do sense an important premise, and that is' the first video sharing platform has no accounting fraud while "comparative" has 6 in the final judged :)
Start right from the grounds of false accounting of "a communication company" and they are all linked to "content" purchases (usually fiction or film) made through "shell" and then a large part of the "final bill" was going to food "a super empty box" called "All iberian" (court rulings are naturally and "its offshoots" are in turn related to multiple different occasions ... i mean 'the alliberian funds are in the process mondadori (trance most 'important is bestowed to the judge "put" who actually made the "judgment of Mondadori award") ... another "historic donation" is' part of the path "political justice" of "craxxi booty" and this case is known as "current account" of the deposit (called "grain" the bill and the name is not "ironic title" but it is real) ... the most 'lunatic trance was given instead " President guarantor "of the association and is already advertising 'surreal there such a thing as the same can 'talk into practice "with a single contact person" ... those written "are just details" passed become final and probably the real ones are also more and do not end here either because' " objective consequences "are precisely within the base publication dedicated to the media (public contributions to everyday are born precisely from the television monopoly of advertising and they are enough only points entered above to understand not resulting in any way from Free market) ... all this for a group with valuations well below "its turnover" 'cause, even today, are greater debts (ie after about 30 years with 95% (between direct and indirect) advertising sales made in an "altered market 'but' increasingly important as a global value (about 7-8 billion euro a year's advertising spending in Italy) you can 'infer' that the mono-subject" not is a "giant" in every sense:) ... now the comparison will be 'with a "company" directly associated to the considerations included in this post and the ones related to the above, of course, included the highlight ... the first thing is that very engaged in the (ie 'no false accounting) and this situation derives "from the contents themselves" ... the company must buy them in debt and does'' in its own way "and is described above while the comparative part does not need to do that because 'the content itself is free of charge and simply adds advertising' ... the latter is then equal only as a term than the one placed in traditional media as the latter may have only one unidirectional (ie 'is only possible to see the product must then find somewhere) ... on this medium it is exactly the opposite and it is precisely this last reason to be tied to the settings described above for both Go ogle ADS and higher SN (optimizations have just that as the difference and can not do otherwise because 'the number of publications is not sufficient to choose the settings ... that thought was also my 2years ago' and then I chose this is because 'normal method was impossible to combine proposals with these specifications is the most' trivial is technical and is linked to upload ... that 'with tens of thousands of specific publications until now, had I chosen to match the normal ones would was impossible to put together ... going back for a moment to value comparisons of today the first "is fatal" (that 'is short and full of debts) while the "Google province", that' youtube ', alone is worth currently from 85 to 90 billion dollars! ... all this done with "infrastructure" relatively inexpensive as well as the base, no matter how sophisticated it is always just a software ...
The sense of course is not tied only aspect of comparison, however, 'is important because the same' are two general systems put in relationship (the reference in this case is the specificity 'of the same means) and in addition to this difference it has a " its congenital "which reduces even the value (derived from the written positions above related to the consolidation method same for them, and that 'decades of monopoly without any real competitors and Bulgaria with a market share well ...) ... then the true sense of this publication is related to things included in 3rd overall and although it is a bit 'difficult to summarize all the steps, remains as the first point to the fact that the method can be applied "by anyone" and is by far more' effective only do sMS or email to postpone the major companies investing in publicly pubblictà '... this fact is added to the specificity' of the medium and not just about interactivity 'complete but another basic import doors and that 'credibility' of those who 'publications) ... do not even need to be high but' it is essential that exists and this thought has two possible developments ... the first is the company directly and monopoly in the version online is exactly the opposite of its natural habitat and the second development is related to ecommerce themselves Post April 9 Post April 10
in these two publications are some specific descriptions and to make them I took the most 'important parts at least in size and it is only in technical function (then their real value is "simply a search engine" and this could be equated with any other sector and recently I made just one example of associating itself to the music and Vevo and the same thing could be applied in any other situation, and as a logical and normal engines do not give as things results easily shared because 'their support structure is the actual basis of the shares, and that 'the multiple intelligence that actually amplifies the messages (ie' is not possible that it may pleasure all with equal transport, however, 'that the motors can not give it, and then the only alternative is the posthumous selection with organic software and is the true sharing and is for this reason that the greatest general of the same does not reach even 50% of the to published and that is a perfectly normal thing ... but today I add a particular linked to credibility 'described above coupled directly to one of the e-commerce and is the first in the world and that' Amazon ... almost everybody knows it in its original version, however, 'was not born this way and probably not even the founders thought to its possible development ... Amazon was a portal and was an official site "multitasking" but' with a specific address and mainly linked to gossip (you type an existing MSN whose homepage is often plastered with things a bit ' "minimum level") ... this detail is important not according to himself but to the development that took Amazon in relation to credibility' described above and its "pedigrees" was not the best to associate it with an activity 'high level (at least in size) in e-commerce ... even this last part is joined to the 3rd general and I placed the extreme right to highlight the possibilities' king wings to do much more 'than postpone mails to major corporations, having their volumes of very important (the way it's always inside the post) ...
At the same I described a few things have happened over the years (the reference is to email for Big Spender) Today I add another of the many I have in mind and I do it on a particular day 'cause the real one was more' or less similar but ' 3 years ago '(it was May 23, 2012) ... is not an ordinary day it was 20 years since the massacre of Capaci and the word' more 'extreme' used was "hypocrisy" (the reference was to former President the republic and here you could write endlessly and in practice I had already 'done' cause that publication of that time was the first of more 'long cycle I've ever written and that' "Open Mail" (they were placed on the page previous and he had several dozen only those) ... the current sense (and also to then) goes' beyond words and is directly coupled to the content of today and all similar publications and is the true sense of the relationship between means communication and advertising and their actual role in system Social is up endless ... this is the real reason for my commitment and support to the same non-profit organization had as its "subjective role" the very basis.
